Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kelvin Institute of Technology

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) — F R ⁺ 06:52, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kelvin Institute of Technology

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A commercial satellite college with no independent degree-granting authority, that runs a handful of courses. The article lacks reliable independent sources, and Google shows only directories, press releases and forums. One author, a WP:SPA, username is a match for the company's business development manager. Guy (Help!) 13:48, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete and recreate - Suits speedy delete as it is very very promotional, however it is still notable. It shall be re-edited in someway anyways. ^CYBER_{Talk: Online} 14:25, 25 April 2018 (UTC) striking nonsense from now blocked, block evading sock--Dlohcierekim (talk) 16:05, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and as wholly promotional WP:ARTSPAM. I tagged for WP:CSD#G11. No, it is not notable. It cannot and should not be recreated w/o sourcing showing it meets notability. --Dlohcierekim (talk) 14:00, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

~~Agree to disagree. It is notable with proper sources. ^CYBER_{Talk: Online} 14:24, 25 April 2018 (UTC)~~striking reply from now blocked, block evading sock--Dlohcierekim (talk) 16:05, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. nothing really spamming except the gallery, which i removed. A genuine tertiary institution. Affiliation in India can be a matter of who technically gives the degree, not administrative or education independence. DGG ( talk ) 04:10, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per DGG. While the article can certainly use expansion and improvement, Wikipedians will gain no benefit from its deletion, but can only profit from the awareness of this institute's existence. Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 23:20, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 10:55, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 10:55, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, So Why 11:59, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kirbanzo (talk) 15:04, 8 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: a degree-awarding tertiary institution. K.e.coffman (talk) 17:30, 12 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.